Health care outcomes may be superior in patients cared for in Canada vs. the United States
via Metafilter.
I already knew survival rates for many illnesses were more favourable in Canada than the States (a major exception to made for cardiology -- if you need heart surgery, you're much better off in the States, provided you can afford the care you need). I researched survival rates in relation to wait lists for care, and learned that despite our (sometimes reprehensibly long) wait lists, Canadians are less likely to die than Americans. But I didn't realize the U.S. spent so much more on health care than the Canadian government -- and Americans don't even have the same ease of access (I know, I know . . . wait lists) that Canadians have.
And the Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortions" without concessions for cases where the mother's life is endangered by continuing the pregnancy.
These things are wrong. Completely and utterly wrong.


And you're absolutely right. I happen to be part of a really excellent HMO and have great coverage through my work, but I'm the exception and not the rule in this country, and I don't have a family to cover, which would increase my costs dramatically--and with this abortion thing, Canada is looking better every day.
Posted by: Jessica | 18 April 2007 at 10:01 PM
I am going to respectfully disagree about the "abortion" thing. Partial Birth Abortion is only one option for a woman to end the life within her. The ban was not on late term abortion, it was on this inhumane procedure.
There ARE other options for women whose lives are in danger.
I must agree with you on the rest, though. From all I've read and heard, those north of the border have a better system for healthcare.
Posted by: Holly | 19 April 2007 at 11:43 AM
Many things are wrong and right with both systems. It's too bad we cannot choose the best of both.
Posted by: Martha Mihaly | 19 April 2007 at 01:55 PM
Yes, I've often joked that if the US just spent the same amount of money they do right now, but spread it around differently...life would change a lot. Like less administration, more health?
Thank you for posting this, Louise. The Supreme Court decision drove me nuts as you know. The alternative surgical procedure is not as safe, and frankly would not work for some women. I'd personally rather have a medical professional help me decide than a bunch of elderly judges and lawyers!
Thank God I'm in Canada.
Posted by: Aurelia | 20 April 2007 at 06:40 PM
obviously, you're a complete tool!
Posted by: kel al | 21 April 2007 at 07:32 PM
I am sure the outcomes are more favorable in Canada because veryone has access to medical care, even if there is a wait. While we have excellent care in the States, not everyone has access. That is what is despicable.
I hope your mom is doing well and that you and your sister are hanging in there. *Hugs*
Posted by: Jeannette | 22 April 2007 at 09:46 AM
Thanks for the link. Like your first commenter (?), I had an HMO during my cancer year and the year after. This is my first year with "consumer-driven health care" and it sucks. I am paying more for less. I really hope that with new legislators, health care will be affordable and accessible for all people.
And that Supreme Court decision is enfuriating, but not surprising.
Posted by: Terri | 23 April 2007 at 01:42 PM